|
___________________________
Staff Articles
__ ___
Svante E. Cornell
Turkish Daily News, 3
December 2003
While Turkey is used to
terrorism, the nature and magnitude of the attacks that killed over 50
and injured over 700 people is new, and has far-reaching implications.
As tragic as they are, they represent an opportunity to consolidate
Turkey's place in the western world and as a major actor in the war on
terror.
Kurdish, Marxist and
Islamic terrorist networks sowed fear in Turkey throughout the 1980s
and 1990s. But those terrorists, while often aided from abroad, were
homegrown, and their scope and abilities were limited. Now, for the
first time, Turkey has been subjected to high-profile international
terrorism. The Al Qaeda pattern of simultaneous suicide bombs was
something hitherto unknown in Turkey. While domestic terrorists were
undoubtedly part of the implementation, clearly the planning,
training, and timing of the bombings was international in nature.
The choice of Turkey as
a major al-Qaeda target was far from random. Islamic extremists
despise Turkey as a traitor to the Muslim world because of its century
of westernization, its secularism, and its close alliance with the
U.S. In this sense, the Istanbul attacks were clearly meant as a price
tag to Turkey's western orientation and its close ties to the U.S.
Turkey's historic friendship with Jews and its close ties to Israel
also made it a target of choice, as the symbolic bombing of two
synagogues clearly illustrates.
It is also no
coincidence that Turkey was attacked just as it had offered to send up
to 10,000 troops to Iraq to support the U.S. forces there. Its
contingent would be the third largest after the American and British
presence, proving Turkey's role as America's strongest ally in the
region. Moreover, as the U.S. seeks to build democracy in Iraq, Turkey
stands out as the single available model for a modern, democratic and
secular Muslim state, attracting further ire from extremists.
The bombing of Jewish
and British interests in Turkey should not be seen only as an attack
on Jews and the U.K., but on everything that Turkey stands for: a
progressive, modern Muslim nation seeking to integrate itself with the
west, allied to the U.S. and with good relations with Israel.
As tragic as these
events are, they provide a significant opportunity to further solidify
Turkey's position in the west and its role in the global war on
terrorism. In the past few years, Turkey has been spared from the
scourge of large-scale terrorist attacks, and has been focusing on
rebuilding its economy after the financial collapse of 2001. Turkey
was now badly reminded of its vulnerability, and of the need to
actively and decisively fight terrorism. More importantly, the
international connection of the attacks is likely to convince Turkish
leaders that they must take up their place as a leading country in the
war against terrorism.
In the past year,
Turkey's ties to the U.S. have been marred by differences arising from
the Iraq war, when the Turkish government supported American use of
Turkish territory, but failed to have Parliament authorize it. Faced
with resurgent terrorism and increasing instability in Iraq that
threaten both Turkish and American interests, the two old allies more
than ever need to bury their differences.
President Bush's visit
to London illustrates how lonely the U.S. and the UK have become in
fighting global terrorism with deeds and not simply with words. The
Istanbul bombs now provide an opportunity to enlist a third crucial
ally in this struggle. Even before the attacks, Turkey's commitment
was proven by its offer to provide troops for Iraq, though the offer
was frozen by the Kurdish elements in the Iraqi governing council. The
appointment of former Turkish Foreign Minister Hikmet Cetin to head
NATO peacekeeping in Afghanistan is another example.
Recognizing Turkey's
commitment, the Bush administration now needs to integrate Turkey
closer into its partnership with the U.K. against terrorism. The U.S.
and Britain could step up their support for Turkey in its efforts to
gain European Union membership, and support the rebuilding of the
Turkish economy. President Bush would also do well to resuscitate and
accept the Turkish offer to provide troops to Iraq, which would
provide much needed help in the Sunni areas of the country.
America, Britain and
Turkey are at present the only countries that have both the will and
the military capacity to fight terrorism with all the means that it
takes. Turkey should be seen not only a victim of terrorism, but as a
crucial force in fighting it.
Deputy
Director, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, Johns Hopkins University-SAIS
|